Prod. 2062 - Ichabod (I)  - Cover

IchabodIchabod
On this, the 99th anniversary of dear Ollie Johnston's birthday, we will start to look at the Ichabod and Mr. Toad drafts! Beginning with 2062 Ichabod, just because it is first in the title and it fits the time of year. Toad's production number is 2011. Here are the cover and the sequence breakdown on its inside.

Comments

  1. AnonymousOctober 31, 2011 at 9:57 AM

    Wow, new draft! I can't wait to do mosaic for that!
    It's have the same production number as "Snow White..."

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hans PerkOctober 31, 2011 at 11:26 AM

    Well, no, Snow White is 2001...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Michael J. RuoccoOctober 31, 2011 at 12:20 PM

    What a coincidence! To celebrate Halloween, I'm watching 'Ichabod' right now, just as I discovered this post on my blogger dashboard! Spooky!

    I'm really looking forward to this one!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Zartok-35October 31, 2011 at 12:24 PM

    Oh boy, the Sleepy Hollow draft! A good choice for this time of year. I can hardly wait to get started!

    ReplyDelete
  5. voiceman91October 31, 2011 at 11:10 PM

    Hans, is Ratty's line, "Sorry, Toad, I misjudged you" animated by Don Lusk, because according to an interview with Eric Larson, Larson actually animated that, calling it "the best dialogue I ever did".

    ReplyDelete
  6. John V.November 2, 2011 at 3:02 AM

    In the film itself, Mr Toad comes first. I wonder why the title is in the wrong order.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Steven HartleyNovember 3, 2011 at 7:51 AM

    WHAT??? I thought Peter Pan was a lineup?

    Good to see Ichabod though - one of my favourites. :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Prod. 2074 - Peter Pan (XVII)  - Seq. 15.0 - Voyage Home -- Ending

Image
Directed by Wilfred "JAXON" Jackson, laid out by Maclaren Stewart. Assistant director Mike Holoboff, secretary Toby (Tobelmann). This FINAL draft dated 11/3/52. Animation by Marvin Woodward (Lost Boys, John, Michael), Eric Larson (Peter), Harvey Toombs (Wendy), Don Lusk (Tink), Norm Ferguson (Nana), Jack Campbell (Father), Art Stevens, Milt Kahl (Father, Mother, Wendy), Marc Davis (Mother), Hal King (John), George Rowley (anchor chain, pixie dust, sail, ship), Josh Meador (cloud-ship). And that concludes the draft for Peter Pan, the fourteenth complete feature film draft on this blog! (Ok, you smart-alecks, we still need to see the last page of the Pink Elephant sequence...) As always, I feel the need to stress that these documents were kept to keep track of the responsible person, and as such it may not reflect precisely the specific directing animators who worked on the sequences. If e.g. an inker or checker needed to find out who animated the scene because of some question
Read more

The First Hyperion Ave. Studio

Image
I used to wonder where precisely Walt Disney's first 2719 Hyperion Ave. studio was located, and what it looked like. Since reading about it first in the 1970s in Dave Smith's article in Michael Barrier's great Funnyworld, I spent hours looking at photos, aerial photographs, maps etc, until I found I had a pretty good impression. My aim here is to pass some of that on to you, as I have found there was an interest in this since I posted this image of the staff with their new Charlotte Clark dolls on my Facebook page: Looking through Cecil Munsey's Disneyana, it appears to me that the "funny looking" Mickey with the button eyes is actually an example of the 1930 British-made pose-able Mickey by the Dean's Rag Book company of London. First, the WHERE. Here is the front of the Gelsons parking lot, with the original plot of the studio indicated in a blueish hue. We see the very small building, the back yard that has a car shed does not even reach the current Gel
Read more

Miffy the Movie in cinemas in Holland!

Image
Finally, the film I directed called " nijntje de film " ( miffy the movie ) has gone into general release in 118 cinemas in Holland today! As you can imagine, I am very proud of this film. Interestingly, the reviews are split in two: the ones where the reviewer saw the film WITH a children's audience all give the film four out of five stars, while the ones who have NOT seen the film with kids give it three out of five, and mention "I doubt if the film can keep the young audience captivated." The "four star" reviewers note that it can - that the film "works!" In the Dutch TV guide Troskompas , in the very first review published a week ago, I found a very clear view on this: the reviewer wrote that he feels he has no way of judging the film, but as his kid loved it and was entertained all the way, he could not but give the film four stars. To me, that is the only way to look at it: does our target audience like it? Are they amused and entertai
Read more